What evidence is their belief based on, what is the sampling size. Based on my personal experience with quite a few dogs I’m calling BS on that theory.I had a discussion with my training group about carrier's and if they are alittle harder to get under control and are they better markers than non carriers.
What does everyone think?
It was just small talk at the end of our sessionWhat evidence is their belief based on, what is the sampling size. Based on my personal experience with quite a few dogs I’m calling BS on that theory.
In my honest opinion, EIC status being related to marking ability is just field trial superstition.Thought i could get an honest opinion on here
I think it is probably a lot of wishful thinking and maybe for the benefit of the breed because for a while no one, and I mean, no one, wanted an eic carrier.It was just small talk at the end of our session
No evidence to prove anything
I have a one year old male out of FC AFC Tucked Away At Rivers Edge that is a carrier and a marking fool and a total fire breather at the line so that is how it came up
Thought i could get an honest opinion on here
Tucker is not an EIC carrier. HuntingLabPedigreeIt was just small talk at the end of our session
No evidence to prove anything
I have a one year old male out of FC AFC Tucked Away At Rivers Edge that is a carrier and a marking fool and a total fire breather at the line so that is how it came up
Thought i could get an honest opinion on here
I spent a week with Tucker and Alex in Oregon pre-national training. From what I remember, he was not a "total fire breather" but a pretty balanced animal, great marker, and one hell of a dog.It was just small talk at the end of our session
No evidence to prove anything
I have a one year old male out of FC AFC Tucked Away At Rivers Edge that is a carrier and a marking fool and a total fire breather at the line so that is how it came up
Thought i could get an honest opinion on here
I'm in total agreement. Unless there is a peer reviewed study, of which I know none at the moment, this is just heresayWhat evidence is their belief based on, what is the sampling size. Based on my personal experience with quite a few dogs I’m calling BS on that theory.
Just out of curiosity, historically how many great dogs might have been EIC carriers or affected and bred to dogs with the same situation? I have no idea when all the testing began and how thorough it was years ago. Ive looked up great dogs from the past and there is no listing on EIC. Just curious with all the dogs, trainers and vets youve been around in your life.What evidence is their belief based on, what is the sampling size. Based on my personal experience with quite a few dogs I’m calling BS on that theory.
Well....Contrary to popular belief, I may own an EIC carrier. His daddy was known as an outlaw and suspected to throw vocal dogs. He is the polar opposite of his daddy's reputation. Solid as a rock and quiet as a church mouse on the line. I'm not 100 percent certain that he is a carrier. His breeder had the pups tested. But I bought him at 3 months old and the paperwork had been misplaced or lost, not that it would have made a difference either way. While he is an above average marker at times ( not always consistent ), I would actually like him to have been a wee bit more animated at the line. It's really ironic because he has stellar line manners but can't seem to settle down in the house, always on the go and always in your face. I wouldn't take a million buck for him though!!I had a discussion with my training group about carrier's and if they are alittle harder to get under control and are they better markers than non carriers.
What does everyone think?
We were aware of dogs who “went down” (collapsed) in the late 70s but there were very few dogs and most episodes seemed to occur during basic training. The syndrome exploded in the early to mid 90s eventually leading to it’s clinical identification as Exercise Induced Collapse. The search for a cause included diagnoses of myasthenia gravis, hypoglycemia, Addison’s disease, cardiac disease, malignant hyperthermia, and some unidentified neuromuscular disorder. The familial tendency was recognized and therefore it was assumed to be a genetic disorder. The genetic mutation was identified in 2007 leading to the introduction of the genetic test by the University of Minnesota Neuromuscular Laboratory. Prior to the test identification of carriers was impossible but some popular sires were implicated but the number is purely speculative. Simply stated the manifestation of the disease is the result of depletion of the neuromuscular transmitter, a chemical secreted by the nerve which is received by receptors on the muscle, producing muscular activity. There is wide variation in the amount of activity required to induce collapse in affected dogs. Some tolerate moderate to extreme activity without displaying symptoms while others can collapse with minimal activity. Observers of affected dogs believed excitement seemed to produce or exacerbate collapsing episodes. My memory is not well served with regards to dogs known to collapse prior to identification of the syndrome and subsequent testing and even if it was identifying those dogs now would be a useless enterprise. I do know one great bitch with over 200 all age points who was affected but never collapsed. The evolution of EIC from sporadic occurrence to almost epidemic occurrence was enhanced by the widespread acceptance and use of frozen semen and popularly used sires. The idea that carrying a gene mutation associated with neuromuscular activation plays any part in a complex activity like marking ability requires a huge leap of faith without any even vague evidence.Just out of curiosity, historically how many great dogs might have been EIC carriers or affected and bred to dogs with the same situation? I have no idea when all the testing began and how thorough it was years ago. Ive looked up great dogs from the past and there is no listing on EIC. Just curious with all the dogs, trainers and vets youve been around in your life.
Thanks for the clarification.Thanks for the input
Alex and Tucker live 5 mins from me i know how awesome he is!!
Do people stay away from stud carrier's?
His mom is a carrier @Don Smith
![]()
Thanks so much for coming back to RTF, Dr. Ed. You are such a wealth of knowledge both in veterinary medical issues but also in field trials, as well as anything dogs, it seems. I always look forward to your comments.We were aware of dogs who “went down” (collapsed) in the late 70s but there were very few dogs and most episodes seemed to occur during basic training. The syndrome exploded in the early to mid 90s eventually leading to it’s clinical identification as Exercise Induced Collapse. The search for a cause included diagnoses of myasthenia gravis, hypoglycemia, Addison’s disease, cardiac disease, malignant hyperthermia, and some unidentified neuromuscular disorder. The familial tendency was recognized and therefore it was assumed to be a genetic disorder. The genetic mutation was identified in 2007 leading to the introduction of the genetic test by the University of Minnesota Neuromuscular Laboratory. Prior to the test identification of carriers was impossible but some popular sires were implicated but the number is purely speculative. Simply stated the manifestation of the disease is the result of depletion of the neuromuscular transmitter, a chemical secreted by the nerve which is received by receptors on the muscle, producing muscular activity. There is wide variation in the amount of activity required to induce collapse in affected dogs. Some tolerate moderate to extreme activity without displaying symptoms while others can collapse with minimal activity. Observers of affected dogs believed excitement seemed to produce or exacerbate collapsing episodes. My memory is not well served with regards to dogs known to collapse prior to identification of the syndrome and subsequent testing and even if it was identifying those dogs now would be a useless enterprise. I do know one great bitch with over 200 all age points who was affected but never collapsed. The evolution of EIC from sporadic occurrence to almost epidemic occurrence was enhanced by the widespread acceptance and use of frozen semen and popularly used sires. The idea that carrying a gene mutation associated with neuromuscular activation plays any part in a complex activity like marking ability requires a huge leap of faith without any even vague evidence.
Do you mind pming me your bitchs pedigree i love Tucker pupsThanks for the clarification.
I've been talking to Alex this week. I may have a Tucker breeding later this year.