I commend anyone trying to make a DC from show labs. I do, honestly. I think most folks would start off investigating how difficult trials are to begin with and just get something which increases the odds of winning from the start. I understand your logic of not taking what could be "presumed" as the easy road. Hey, I have Chesapeakes.

Cry me a river. lol. I have been around plenty of show labs. And I'm definitely not pointing any names out for you Nichole. I live at a kennel and retriever training grounds. I see it all. However, I'm no pro. I've also attended many dog shows and I myself have been in the show ring ONCE

I've been to advanced OBED classes in the past. I'm fairly well rounded.
We hear it all the time, folks complaining they don't have a place to train, they don't have water, they don't have birds and on and on and on and on. Bottom line is that if you don't get out, "proof" your breeding by getting a title, training for hunting etc, then, just breed the dog because it has a few ribbons from a dog show, you've done the breed ZERO due diligence and really are contributing to the negative aspects which often are the cherished conversations ringside.
Obviously, Bridget has a respectable focus and goal and judging by her signature has some titles and bred to titled dogs. I commend that anyday. Is it my cup of tea? not really. From the standpoint of generally speaking, I've seen far more show labs with a lack of interest in feather, lack of prey drive than any other breed which comes through this place. Dogs messing up at a WC is often training. I get that. I've seen it and volunteered to help run three lab WC's. Often, it's the first time I think many ever see a bird each year. I guess that isn't the dogs fault. However, when dogs are worked with one on one and have no, I mean ZERO interest in birds yet they are bred because they get a special ribbon one day.....that isn't good business. You definitely don't see the field trial breedings following that lead.