Joined
·
3,234 Posts
Here is the gradiant, from lowest to highest: poor - fair - good - very-good - excellent.
Here is the question: Is it reasonable to believe a "very-good amateur trainer" with a "very-good dog" can earn a field championship without the aid of a professional?
Why or why not? Would it take only an "excellent trainer" with an "excellent dog" to do it without the pro?
Here is the question: Is it reasonable to believe a "very-good amateur trainer" with a "very-good dog" can earn a field championship without the aid of a professional?
Why or why not? Would it take only an "excellent trainer" with an "excellent dog" to do it without the pro?