This commitment and consideration thing goes both ways:
I had a local hunt test club ask me repeatedly to judge a local HRC event. I had to turn him down a couple years in a row, because I was already booked for the year, but suggested we plan a date a couple years out so I could actually put it on the calendar and commit to it. We committed to a date and I stuck to it.
I made contact with him a couple times and all was set. I confirmed I was judging and I even went and recruited a co-judge, coming in from a few hundred miles away. He was an RTF person whom I'd never met in person, but seemed to have similar philosophies to myself. I figured we would have a nice time and probably put on a good stake for the local club.
I learned shortly before the committed HT judging date, that a local Field Trial was a conflict, and I'd really have loved to run my own dog in it. But, I made a commitment and as such, I kept it. Then after the local trial entry deadline was closed, the HRC club rep called and told me that due to low entries, they were cancelling a flight. They kept my co-judge, whom I had recruited, and covered his expenses while dropping a local judge (me).
I have heard rumors that there was local scuttlebut that since my current lab was running Field Trials and not HRC, I was not a desirable judge. It was therefore suggested that they drop me and keep only judges perceived to be more loyal to the HRC program, to right-size their judging panel. This sort of small-minded, "us versus them" mentality is very bad for organizations and propogates the nonsense that those who run another venue must be somehow undesirable.
Since then, I've judged AKC Field Trials only and have let my HRC judging seminar and written test currency lapse. I do pay dues to HRC, and I'm a "never say 'never'" sort of guy. But for now, there are no HRC plans on my calendar through Fall 2017.
For those of you who get a judge to commit for a long time period out: When you need to cut a flight - please think seriously about the commitment that the person you're cutting had made to you.
Thanks, Chris
****************************************************