The Retriever Field Trial News has just issued a press release
http://www.working-retriever.com/rftentry.html
http://www.working-retriever.com/rftentry.html
Which one of those three throw the birds all weekend at an event??? And how do they get them to do it for less than it costs to produce a catalog???Judges' travel costs, birds and catalogues are the three most expensive elements of a weekend event.
I am not an Arkansas attorney, but I doubt whether under these facts offering free catalogs consitutes impermissible below cost pricing.It seems to me if it turns out that RTFN would be losing money on entries by giving away the catalogs for a period of time, this would be considered an anti-competitive action to destroy the other firm in the arena. I do not know how much income is derived from advertising, so it still may profitable. It seems unlikely, though.
I am not an attorney. Perhaps someone here has some expertise in predatory business practices.
Maybe they've never had to put on a weekend trial.I particularly liked this line:
Which one of those three throw the birds all weekend at an event??? And how do they get them to do it for less than it costs to produce a catalog???
Inquiring mind regards,
kg
Out of curiousity, does anyone think that since RFTN is the "premier" FT (and AKC HT) reporting souce, RFTN feels that they have more to offer than the subscriber who cancels has to lose? Or, in other words, that RFTN doesn't really care if they lose some subscribers???I will cancel my subscrpition to RFTN.
It is my understanding that Retriever Field Trail News has about 4000 subscribers, not many for a monthly publication and there is no large untapped reservoir of potential subscribers.Out of curiousity, does anyone think that since RFTN is the "premier" FT (and AKC HT) reporting souce, RFTN feels that they have more to offer than the subscriber who cancels has to lose? Or, in other words, that RFTN doesn't really care if they lose some subscribers???Doing without a RFTN subscription regards,
Isn't that 1972?...
Ex-Retriever Field Trial News Subscriber Since 1992 Regards.......![]()
nah, I was still paying for it back then.........my well chronicled break up with RFTN management was in 1992.....Isn't that 1972?.
I would gladly pay at least a $42 subscription to something like that. Maybe even more if up to date statistics such as those found in "1941-1995 Retriever field Trial Statistics by Susan E Reynolds," were accessible.It is unfortunate that RFTN did not invest it's resources into a quality online publication with up to date news, statistics, and real time field trial and hunt test results, that I believe, would have been well received, popular, and profitable.