After reading another thread, Do you think that a client should have to pay if the dog fails the test?
My reasoning behind this is that a am or pro trainer are being paid to an expected level per the client. If the trainer is doing his/her job there is no reason the dog should fail. I know there could be some exceptions to this like the dog passes the first 3 but failed the 4th, but if the trainer runs the dog again and still fails the 4th should the client be responsible for this run? I know sometimes we don't know what dog is coming off the truck.
I know I'll take some butt chewing but it would only make sense to me. Like in the other thread the dog failed 3 times in a row, I don't think I should have to pay because parts of training were overlooked. I would say the trainer knows what to expect from a test and should train for it.
Am I making any sense?
My reasoning behind this is that a am or pro trainer are being paid to an expected level per the client. If the trainer is doing his/her job there is no reason the dog should fail. I know there could be some exceptions to this like the dog passes the first 3 but failed the 4th, but if the trainer runs the dog again and still fails the 4th should the client be responsible for this run? I know sometimes we don't know what dog is coming off the truck.
I know I'll take some butt chewing but it would only make sense to me. Like in the other thread the dog failed 3 times in a row, I don't think I should have to pay because parts of training were overlooked. I would say the trainer knows what to expect from a test and should train for it.
Am I making any sense?