Looks like starting out with a bear this morning !
We have no clue what's going to happen, but if things hold the same & if they do make a big cut (2 big ifs as this is speculation @ best.) I don't see the issue. IMO, marks should matter more & I do not like the idea of handles playing. Whenever you get a chance to drop the dog, do it. Again, strictly IMO.junbe said:Two day test?--Then big cuts based on 5 marks. land blind?
I surely hope you change this attitude if and when you judge.We have no clue what's going to happen, but if things hold the same & if they do make a big cut (2 big ifs as this is speculation @ best.) I don't see the issue. IMO, marks should matter more & I do not like the idea of handles playing. Whenever you get a chance to drop the dog, do it. Again, strictly IMO.
It was pure speculation @ best as I said. I merely said it as the time frame shows 2 days to finish & if they did it. Not saying they would.Ted Shih said:Traditionally, unlike weekend field trials, dogs are allowed two dings (e.g handle, huge hunt, bad blind) before they are dropped. Again, traditionally, the big cut comes after the 5th series land triple/ quad
It's like NASCAR. If you hit the wall on lap 20 you have time to recover and might keep running. If you hit the wall on the last lap you're done.It was pure speculation @ best as I said. I merely said it as the time frame shows 2 days to finish & if they did it. Not saying they would.
Now, here's a question that you can answer in pm if you'd rather do so. Besides it being tradition, why is it that a dog who is clean and sometimes very clean dropped after a handle in the 9th when a dog who handles in the 1st and even another handle later isn't dropped? Those are the real head scratches for myself. Just morbid curiosity is all.
I should have specified. A total failure is what I was talking about. Sorry, but I, nor pretty much anybody I know believes that a dog with mediocre marks & a complete failure on a blind should keep playing in a weekend FT.Rainmaker said:I surely hope you change this attitude if and when you judge.
I cleared up the misunderstanding.ErinsEdge said:I would consider listening to those who have actually run nationals and I also second hoping you don't judge with that attitude.
I believe we actually had a discussion about handles in a National just last fall while training @ The Caire's property. Sigh.Melanie Foster said:Jacob,
Now would be a good time for you to hush up and see how a National is different than anything you have experienced. When Mr. Danny gets home, ask him what he thinks about a handle not playing and let us know what he says.
And please don't start judging until you lose the "whenever you get a chance to drop the dog, do it" mentality. You have formed some very strong opinions for your extremely short amount of time in the game. Don't Phase 2 us for too long, K? Thankuverymuch. :razz:
Total failure is a tad different than what you implied in your original post, where you prefaced it with saying you didn't like handles to keep playing. But won't sidetrack this thread any further, we all have our own preferences for dog work and those judging it.I should have specified. A total failure is what I was talking about. Sorry, but I, nor pretty much anybody I know believes that a dog with mediocre marks & a complete failure on a blind should keep playing in a weekend FT.
Not a double handle. A dog with 2 separate handles. Again, I should have specified.Melanie Foster said:Because the latter dog most likely made it to the 10th series and handled there. Dogs who make it to the 10th and pick up the birds are finalists. Where have you seen a double handle prior to the 10th series getting called back? That would be quite rare.
Thank you, Dr. Ed. That makes it a little clearer for myself. Good luck tomm & throughout the week.EdA said:When I ran my first National Amateur in 1982 someone far wiser and more experienced told me that when you make a mistake is often more important than what that mistake is, ie if you make a mistake in a series that the judges want to drop dogs you will probably be gone. One of the many great challenges of judging a National is being consistent with drops.
I forgive you. Just this once.Melanie Foster said:My bad, I meant to say two handles, not a double handle. You all know I am not a morning person!![]()
That would have knocked the wind out of me & made me want to puke.huntinman said:I can answer that one because it happened to me. In the 2001 Nat'l in Cheraw, SC I went into the 9th very clean. My dog ended up with a massive hunt out of the area... AND a handle (her first) 2 dings and I was dropped. It was like a kick in the gut... but we failed the test.
But the real answer to your question is: it depends... on the dogs other work... Only the judges know.