So it might be trolling on Facebook, but it seems to have gotten a few breeders up in arms. That the AKC is purposing to get rid of limited registration, because this will increase the # of puppies that are registered with them. I think their premise is wrong, if people aren't registering dogs it's not because they have limited registration, its because most people don't care about giving AKC $$ to get AKC papers, which realistically if your not gonna breed and your not gonna run events why would you need them? If the AKC wants more $$ on registrations offer people something for their $30, besides a piece of paper
.
What are everyone's thoughts? I'm on the fence I don't particularly like limited registration, and wouldn't buy a dog with it. But I can also see how it might be nice for a breeder to keep track of owners and ensure their stock has minimum clearances before anyone breeds them. Completely against those that only give limited registration and will not remove it for any reason (non-show quality screams of this), also don't like the give me more $$$ for full registration either.
What are everyone's thoughts? I'm on the fence I don't particularly like limited registration, and wouldn't buy a dog with it. But I can also see how it might be nice for a breeder to keep track of owners and ensure their stock has minimum clearances before anyone breeds them. Completely against those that only give limited registration and will not remove it for any reason (non-show quality screams of this), also don't like the give me more $$$ for full registration either.