RetrieverTraining.Net - the RTF banner
1 - 2 of 8 Posts
I don't think this can correlate to this is why no kill shelters don't work, but could be why SOME do not. One problem I see is...

Lied (pronounced leed) is the main shelter in the Las Vegas area, a nonprofit center that is contractually obligated to accept strays and animals turned in by animal control departments from the Las Vegas and North Las Vegas as well as the unincorporated areas of Clark County.
This reads to me that this shelter got in over it head by being contractually obligated to accept strays from the animal control. Having to accept animals is a problem of no kill shelters, but there are many out there that do work and it is just a guess but I bet most that are successful are not obligated to take any animals, especially form the local animal control. Being a nonprofit is hard enough without being obligated to take in animals you cannot care for.
 
I see it like this; there are at least two kinds of no-kill shelters, those that are run properly and those that are not. I think the latter is usually a byproduct of very well intentioned people with more emotion that brains.
We have two here that are examples of both types. One is well managed and knows its limitations. The other is a bunch of people, mostly AR’s, who want to save every animal in the world. While they mean well they do not have the funding or the know how to run a shelter of the size they are. They honestly feel that they are doing good for these animals even though that is far from the actuality of it. It is a shame that the way they are run also polarizes the community that supports them both. The better run shelter gets far more community support ($$$) that the other in part because the better run shelter is a nicer place to visit. When better funded you can offer more and be in the public eye more leading to even more income….vicious circle for the lesser of the two
 
1 - 2 of 8 Posts