[birddogn_tc]

I was looking at the Retriever Results webpage and looking at some handlers records, etc. It doesn't really seem to line up with what Entry Express says. Is that common? For instance it says the handler went X of X on Master passes in 2014. However, Entry Express shows that the handler ran many more events than X. Am I missing something?

 

[Thomas D]

Was more than one handler listed on EE?

 

[birddogn_tc]

Good thought, I just checked. On Entry Express I click on the name of the handler and then when scrolling through the entries, it's shows a different name as the handler. So, i went to Retriever Results to look up that person and they don't exist in Retriever Results. So confusing.

 

[Repaupo]

It seems that some of the record keeping isn't what someone would have thought it might be. When I look at handlers it appears that only passes are shown, I haven't seen a fail. Maybe I'm missing something and you are right the record keeping is confusing.

 

[JKOttman]

So far we're only calculate dog records in terms of pts/start and passes. We haven't been able to do much with handler records in hunt tests because we haven't figured out a way to accurately capture who handled the dog. But then the partner who does all the programming sometimes dreams stuff up and forgets to tell me about it. So please provide an example so i can dig into this further. thanks!

 

[Camo9244]

Thanx for all u do Josie!!! Luv me Retriever Results!!

 

[Jim Spagna]

I think Retriever Results is fantastic, however, I just looked my dog up and found a HUGE number of errors. Makes me want to shy away from RR because I can't be sure their reporting is accurate. I wish someone would so the same thing for HRC HT's.

 

[JKOttman]

I think Retriever Results is fantastic, however, I just looked my dog up and found a HUGE number of errors. Makes me want to shy away from RR because I can't be sure their reporting is accurate. I wish someone would so the same thing for HRC HT's.

If there are errors particularly "huge" ones we want to know about them. Please send me an email (josie@retrieverresults.com) or call 609-306-9101 so we can get it figured out. After all whatever is going on with you may not be isolated to just your dog.
Josie

 

[crackerd]

Hey, Josie, the unofficial mayor of Hartly, Del. (as ennobled by your friend the Sultan of South Jersey and the South Bronx) wants to know if Retriever Results will ever list the top Amish trainers...

MG

 

[JKOttman]

Too funny. Just have to find a way to figure out who's Amish.

 

[crackerd]

Just have to find a way to figure out who's Amish.

Funny, 'cause while you've been busy at launching the Canadian RR, my intel has Glenda "plugging in" Occam's Razor Retriever Theory at the Livermore Labs diagnostic center to make just that determination. Glenda, you confirming?

MG

 

[Glenda Brown]

Glenda is currently about ready to go under for the third time. Had lots of family visiting. Forgot how much energy teen-age girls seem to possess and the amount of work involved with managing a very busy, active household. Anyway --- Crackerd --- I have been checking in with Livermore and they said they would get back to me as soon as they have it all figured out.

Actually, I would bet on Josie more than on Livermore. She has never let me down, and at times, the results they have sent me didn't square up with my calculations.

An exhausted Glenda who was just told by her son-in-law that I have to give up my very friendly old computer and move into a new one and get with the program! or words to that effect.

 

[JKOttman]

I think Retriever Results is fantastic, however, I just looked my dog up and found a HUGE number of errors. Makes me want to shy away from RR because I can't be sure their reporting is accurate. I wish someone would so the same thing for HRC HT's.

Just went thru RR's records for Deacon and we had one pass incorrect. That error has been corrected on the website. We also compared our results to EE and we and they agree. Did you find any others? If so please let us know what they are. Don't want to have "huge" errors out there for you or anyone else.

Also looked up the other dog listed in your signature line and couldn't find any results, but perhaps that's because our data starts in mid-2009.

Thanks Glenda, 2015, the year of the golden!