RetrieverTraining.Net - the RTF banner
1 - 20 of 47 Posts

Jon Couch

· Registered
Joined
·
710 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
Hey All,

I was wondering, since alot of you seem to be pretty well informed on digital photography, if anyone had any info on the Sony Alpha 200 DSLR 10.2 Mpk. Any info would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks alot,

Jon
 
Sony makes some great products, but they are pretty new to DSLR's. I believe the Sony Alpha 100 was their first DSLR, which came out last year (maybe). If it were my money I would wait until Sony was more established in the DSLR world before I purchased one. Not that they are bad, the verdicts just not out yet. You might want to consider Canon and Nikon. Early this week I've heard Nikon actually bought canon. Canon has some nice entry DSLR, which are the Rebels. Nikon has some to and they are D40, D60, D80. Nikon's kit lenses are far better than cannon's kit lenses, but a lot of people might not be able to tell a difference. Take a look at http://www.cameralabs.com

They have a lot of good information on cameras, lenses, and everything in between. They also have a forums that you can ask questions on and get much better responses.

Good luck,
Carey
 
I just went thru this. Was looking at Canon & Nikon.
I settled on the Canon Digital Rebel XTi, and it's rated very well.
Now I'm trying to decide which telephoto lens to get fot it. Looking at the EF 70-300mm f4-5.6 IS USM.
 
Discussion starter · #6 ·
I've been reading up on the sony and I looks like they were rating it higher than the Rebel XTI at least where I was reading. Sooooooooo confused I just want to take some nice pics
 
Here's a good site for reviews of all the popular cameras.

http://www.dpreview.com/

Click on "Camera database" to see all the cameras of a particular maker.

Click on "Buying guide" to select several (same of different maker) to see the features in a side-by-side comparison.

Click on "Discussion forums" to read and ask questions.

Sony bought Olympus about 2 years ago which sort of leveraged them into the DSLR market after they were reasonably successful in the point and shoot arena.

Eric
 
I would stick with Canon, Nikon .


Sasha

I've been shooting pictures for a number of years. I totally agree with the above statement (having deleted the fuji reference).

The system available for Cannon and Nikon FAR surpass anything available for other cameras. I got started with Nikon so that's what I will stick with. Now I use a D300 which is an amazing camera. Several folks who work with me have D40x and they are really nice at an incredibly low price.

You can't go wrong with Cannon or Nikon. Pick one.

John
________
MFLB VAPORIZER
 
I have priced and tried both the Canon XTi and Nikon D40x. I like both, but, the Canon XTi feels awkward to me. Has anyone else experienced this?
 
I sold cameras for 10 years and I own the Canon Digital Rebel. Nikon's are great, but I think the Canon is more intuitive for novice users.
 
I sold cameras for 10 years and I own the Canon Digital Rebel. Nikon's are great, but I think the Canon is more intuitive for novice users.
I've been shooting with a Canon XLT for the past 6 months or so, and I'm very happy with it. It's been a long time since my education in 35mm photography, so I'm getting up to speed with digital.

I had a problem with this forum dropping recent pics, but I'll try one here.

Image


Evan
 
Discussion starter · #14 ·
Compared to Canon EOS 400D / Rebel XTi





Canon may have announced the EOS 450D / Rebel XSi, but it’s keeping the earlier 400D / XTi on as its ‘new’ entry-level DSLR. As such it goes directly up against Sony’s Alpha A200. Since the A200 is so similar to its predecessor, the argument between it and the 400D / XTi is similar to previous comparisons.

Without Live View, faster continuous shooting or a higher resolution sensor, both models are quite similar. Both have 10 Megapixel sensors, 3fps continuous shooting, no Live View, and 9-point AF systems. In the A200’s favour is built-in anti-shake facilities, a slightly longer 18-70mm kit zoom lens, a slightly bigger 2.7in screen, 3200 ISO sensitivity, spot-metering and an InfoLithium battery pack with accurate feedback.

As such, Sony’s cleverly out-specified the 400D / XTi while holding back the big guns for the other Alphas in the range. But like the A100 before it, the A200's high ISO performance is below that of the Canon. It's a tough call with both cameras carrying the same RRP, although most first-time buyers would probably accept the A200's artefacts at higher sensitivities in return for its built-in anti-shake. But we’ve seen the Canon being sold from reputable online dealers for over $100 USD less. So if your budget is tight, the Canon may be more appealing, but the A200 remains a compelling alternative, again considering its built-in anti-shake. See our Canon EOS 400D / Rebel XTi review for more details.



Compared to Nikon D60




Nikon’s latest entry-level DSLR is the D60. We’re yet to review it, but in terms of features, the Sony A200 already looks stronger. Both may have 10 Megapixel sensors, 3fps shooting and no Live View, but the Sony A200’s built-in anti-shake arguably trumps the Nikon’s new stabilised kit lens, the A200’s kit lens itself is slightly longer, the screen is slightly bigger, the maximum sensitivity higher, the battery gives better feedback, and the Sony has a 9-point AF system to the D60’s basic 3-point offering. It’s also worth noting the D60, like the D40(x) before it, does not have a built-in AF motor, so cannot autofocus with non-AF-S Nikkor lenses.

Given an RRP that’s $50 USD higher than the A200, there’s little reason to recommend the D60 over the A200 unless it trumps all rivals in our forthcoming image quality and usability tests. See the complete Nikon DSLR range.
These are the reviews that are leading me in the direction of the Sony. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with the A100 or A200
 
Yes....maybe the Sony camera body can compete with the Cannon and Nikon based on specs.....but what you do not get is "the system".

When I say the system, I mean options from lenses to power sources to flashes... If you were to get into wildlife photography...you're not going to find a 600mm/f4 to fit the sony. If you want to do macro, you may or may not find dedicated macro lenses or extension tubes or...

If all you want is the camera and kit lens and never hope to do more...then get the Sony. But (and this is a big BUT) if you have any inkling that you might get into photography more seriously....you are going to be forced to start over. If you buy a Nikon or Cannon now...any lens you buy for them will forever be interchangable with future cameras from those companies. and no matter what any reviews say...no lenses meet the quality standards of Cannon or Nikon. If you go anywhere and see a working professional photographer....they will be shooting one of the two(both camera and lens). there is a reason for this...they are simply better.

I'm sure the Sony is a fine camera, but folks here are just trying to keep you form later going...."I wish..."

John
________
Avandia Lawsuit Settlements
 
Yes....maybe the Sony camera body can compete with the Cannon and Nikon based on specs.....but what you do not get is "the system".

When I say the system, I mean options from lenses to power sources to flashes...
John
Excellent point. It's easy to find a wide range of lenses for Canons and Nikons...both new and used. You can't say the same for Sony.
 
Discussion starter · #17 ·
Very good point! There are some lenses for the sony and the older Minolta lenses, but I think you may have me swayed!
 
Choosing between a canon and a Nikon is a little like choosing between 2 puppies in a litter. It's pretty much personal preference at this point. i think the Canon is easier to use, but you might like the feel of the Nikon better.
 
Discussion starter · #20 ·
could anyone post some pics from their cameras so that I might be able to choose from any difference in the pics.

Thanks everyone for you responses.

Jon
 
1 - 20 of 47 Posts