RetrieverTraining.Net - the RTF banner
1 - 20 of 21 Posts

Eric Johnson

· Registered
Joined
·
5,113 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
http://www.ussportsmen.org/page.aspx?pid=2665

2/10/11

A bill introduced in Texas would require sporting dog owners to purchase
liability insurance for many of their dogs.

Take Action! Texas sportsmen should contact their state representatives
today and ask them to oppose House Bill 998. Tell them the bill will
create a financial hardship for many responsible sporting dog owners.

House Bill 998, introduced by Rep. Ruth McClendon (D- San Antonio),
would require owners of unneutered male dogs weighing 20 or more pounds,
that are not restrained at all times, to carry a minimum $100,000
insurance liability policy. A dog is only considered restrained if it
is either kept in an enclosure or kept on a leash under the immediate
control of a person at all times.

Failing to purchase the insurance would be a class C misdemeanor.

Under the bill, many sporting dog owners will be forced to buy the
insurance policy, neuter their dog, or face criminal charges. In
addition, a large number of sporting dog breeds weigh more than 20
pounds and would be considered “unrestrained” under the bill’s
definition when hunting, training, or field trialing. Even a securely
tethered dog would be considered unrestrained by this bill.

“It is completely unreasonable to require a dog owner who wants take
their dog hunting or to even play fetch in an unfenced back yard to
require them to purchase liability insurance to do so,” said Jeremy
Rine, U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance associate director of state services.
“In addition to being costly for dog owners, this bill sets an arbitrary
weight threshold – what happens if you have a dog that regularly
fluctuates between 19 and 20 pounds? This bill is unnecessary and
unreasonable and should be opposed by all dog owners alike.”

To find your state representative’s contact information, please visit
www.ussportsmen.org/LAC.
 
Guess I'd have to find a pro that winters somewhere else then.
 
Could you tell me where exactly this bill specifies "sporting dogs" as outlined in your title?

It doesn't. It refers to ALL dogs that meet the requirements outlined. Here is actual link to the bill, rather than some story that offers no real information, other than to incite outrage at the appearance of legislators picking on a specific group of dog owners.

http://bslnews.org/2011/02/02/no-ban-yet-in-texas-bill-introduced-hb-998-not-bsl/

I personally am not for the bill, but thought the correct information should at least be relayed in this forum....
 
The Texas Legislature is in session (fortunately this only happens every 2 years). The State is facing an estimated 27 billion dollar budget deficit which our illustrious Governor fails to acknowledge because he has Presidential aspirations and prefers to push his personal agenda rather than provide leadership for the Legislature. The good news is that the sponsor is a Democrat in a very heavily Republican House so passage, even if it gets to the floor of the House, is highly unlikely.
 
I have contacted The Administrative Secretary for HRC to get this info out to all HRC Clubs in Texas. Could someone contact AKC to get them to funnel this info down to their AKC Clubs in Texas?
 
Discussion starter · #6 ·
Could you tell me where exactly this bill specifies "sporting dogs" as outlined in your title?

It doesn't. It refers to ALL dogs that meet the requirements outlined. Here is actual link to the bill, rather than some story that offers no real information, other than to incite outrage at the appearance of legislators picking on a specific group of dog owners.

http://bslnews.org/2011/02/02/no-ban-yet-in-texas-bill-introduced-hb-998-not-bsl/

I personally am not for the bill, but thought the correct information should at least be relayed in this forum....
The bill doesn't "pick" on sporting dogs but they would be included. Since the article was written by the US Sportsmen's Alliance, they elected to have a catchy headline that their readers, sportsmen, would relate to. As such, I have rendered a true and faithful copy.

I don't write these. I merely provide them. How is the article made different by including Poodles in the headline. Perhaps I should include all 173 AKC registered breeds? Your concern really is without merit.

Eric
 
This is another crack at mandatory spay and neuter...just a little at a time
 
The Texas Legislature is in session (fortunately this only happens every 2 years). The State is facing an estimated 27 billion dollar budget deficit which our illustrious Governor fails to acknowledge because he has Presidential aspirations and prefers to push his personal agenda rather than provide leadership for the Legislature. The good news is that the sponsor is a Democrat in a very heavily Republican House so passage, even if it gets to the floor of the House, is highly unlikely.
Perry??? No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (insert sarcasm smilie)
 
We can't count on this bill not making to the floor. Everybody from Texas needs to contact their State Representative.
 
We can't count on this bill not making to the floor. Everybody from Texas needs to contact their State Representative.
if she wasnt such a refined lady I would ask State Representative Crownover ( R- Denton )to go and biaatch slap Ms McClendon (D - San Antonio);)
 
if she wasnt such a refined lady I would ask State Representative Crownover ( R- Denton )to go and biaatch slap Ms McClendon (D - San Antonio);)
I think that it might still be appropriate BECAUSE her bill is obviously influenced by those that tried mandatory spay neuter.

Dog fighting is illegal ... enforce that
we have "Lillian's Law"...enforce that
Texas is a one bite state...enforce that
 
Thats what is so funny about this. So, if a fighting pit or attack pit is neutered, suddenly he would no longer fight or attack???? Morons I tell ya!
I bet you a lot of money it was a pit now that I know the full picture:

The Congresswoman stated the bill was a direct result of a tragic accident that happened to one of her constituents in her East San Antonio district.

Well if that doesn't tell the whole story I don't know what does.

Having lived in San Antonio, and I'm sure some of our San Antonio residents can chime in, the East Side of San Antonio is pretty much hardcore hood. There are continuous murders of all ages that are typically drug and gang related. I don't want to paint any city or area in a bad light, but the East Side of S.A. has a big time reputation.

So a dog in the hood attacked someone so all owners are irresponsible and all dogs are out of control, roaming the streets and attacking folks all the time.

This is a bunch of bs.
 
I bet you a lot of money it was a pit now that I know the full picture:

The Congresswoman stated the bill was a direct result of a tragic accident that happened to one of her constituents in her East San Antonio district.

Well if that doesn't tell the whole story I don't know what does.

Having lived in San Antonio, and I'm sure some of our San Antonio residents can chime in, the East Side of San Antonio is pretty much hardcore hood. There are continuous murders of all ages that are typically drug and gang related. I don't want to paint any city or area in a bad light, but the East Side of S.A. has a big time reputation.

So a dog in the hood attacked someone so all owners are irresponsible and all dogs are out of control, roaming the streets and attacking folks all the time.

This is a bunch of bs.
And the best way to get your point across to her, is to send her packing. Write the name down, remember it and vote her out.
 
Discussion starter · #16 ·
Here's some subsequent news....

Eric

*****

TX-RPOA E-News
>From RPOA Texas Outreach and Responsible Pet Owners Alliance
"Animal welfare, not animal 'rights' and, yes, there is a difference."
Permission granted to crosspost.
February 10, 2011

HB 998 by Rep. Ruth Jones McClendon, D-San Antonio, is a bill that all dog
owners should oppose, not just hunting dog owners! Rep. Leo Berman,
R-Tyler, wants something done "that would require total security of any
animal that is known to attack human beings." Rep. Chuck Hopson,
R-Jacksonville, has been quoted in the media as saying a bill is also being
drafted by his office. So HB 998 is only the beginning of a very long and
heated legislative session as usual. They don't think this bill goes far
enough. It would also be very easy to make this bill breed specific.
 
This is Texas baby! Republicans out number the Dems 3-1. It will never get anywhere. It is so comical to see these useless politicians try and make a name for themselves.....in some way or another.
Don't be lulled into thinking just become you live in a republican state these laws will not be pushed through.

Legislation which mandates mandatory neuter you can believe has heavy backing and press from HSUS and PETA.

Don't forget what happened in Oklahoma regarding breeder bill legislation.. another republican state.
 
.....so, if my 50 lb. intact female causes trouble that's OK? Only males - sounds kind of sexist to me.

You would think Rep. McClendon would have more important things to work on like the budget deficit, schools closing, immigration, and health care, but oh no, we need to put our time into debating this lunacy.

I'm well aware that HSUS is behind this kind of thing. They just keep pushing. This bills needs to be watched very closely because "they" will try and tack it onto an important bill at the last moment hoping no one will ever notice. That kind of thing happens all the time.

Makes me shake my head and wonder.
 
I would have never thought something like this would even be considered in Texas. Seems to me like closing the barn door after the horse is gone.

BHB
 
I would have never thought something like this would even be considered in Texas. Seems to me like closing the barn door after the horse is gone.

BHB
We have nutty politicians too!
 
1 - 20 of 21 Posts