Anybody feeding either of these?
What do you think?
What do you think?
I don't feed either one but just as points of interest, TOTW is manufactured by Diamond. Diamond has had multiple recalls of their foods in the last few years. I'm not setting off any alarms; I'm just saying that Diamond facilities have had some serious issues so it's something to consider.Anybody feeding either of these?
What do you think?
Ive been feeding totw for about two years and have been very pleased. We'd been having some allergy issues with both Goldens and thet all but cleared up 100% after 30 daysAnybody feeding either of these?
What do you think?
Um, unless I am mistaken, Diamonds recall (that was very serious) was back in 2005-06 and a lawsuit totalling around $3 million was paid out in 2008. Not sure if there has been others that would mean "multiple recalls" or if 2005-06 means "the last few years"... I would have to think that Diamond plants are as safe as any plants any where now.I don't fee either one but just as points of interest, TOTW is manufactured by Diamond. Diamond has had multiple recalls of their foods in the last few years. I'm not setting off any alarms; I'm just saying that Diamond facilities have had some serious issues so it's something to consider.
Diamond cat food was recalled in 2009. So that's two recalls in five years with the latest one being less than two years ago, after Diamond stated how their safety and quality control would lead the industry after the 2006 catastrophe. They're not exactly instilling consumers with confidence.Um, unless I am mistaken, Diamonds recall (that was very serious) was back in 2005-06 and a lawsuit totalling around $3 million was paid out in 2008. Not sure if there has been others that would mean "multiple recalls" or if 2005-06 means "the last few years"... I would have to think that Diamond plants are as safe as any plants any where now.
I really like the TOTW feeds, just too pricey for what I want to feed.
To each his own but read the ingredients of the Performance Formula:I feed nothing but Purina Pro Plan to our 3 labs. Reasons being they all do well on it (2 participate in HRC hunt tests), Purina uses american products whenever possible and I dont know of anybody that puts the time and money into research that they do to give you the best product for your dog. Diamonds a good food these days but the price is right up there with the ProPlan, Jack
I actually contacted Purina regarding the weight of the chicken in the performance formula specifically and they noted that the weight of the chicken is the highest pre and post processing weight.To each his own but read the ingredients of the Performance Formula:
"Chicken, corn gluten meal, brewers rice, animal fat preserved with mixed-tocopherols (form of Vitamin E), poultry by-product meal (natural source of glucosamine), whole grain corn, corn germ meal, fish meal (natural source of glucosamine), animal digest..."
Pro Plan is actually a very cheaply made food sold at premium prices. Given that "chicken" is really just chicken meal BEFORE the water has been removed, that actually puts chicken much further down the ingredient list making corn gluten meal the REAL first ingredient. Corn gluten meal is a cheap filler, likewise for brewers rice which is nothing more than a nutritionally devoid by-product of the brewing industry. While there's nothing wrong with using fat from animal sources, the fact that there isn't a specific source should be of concern. In other words, it could be any combination of chicken, beef, sheep, pig or even animals that aren't used for food in the U. S. at all. Poultry by-product meal has a low biological value. That's followed by more cheap filler and then animal digest. Purina is the same company that puts a known toxin in some of its foods (Propylene Glycol) as well as plain old sugar. Just remember that shoe leather is high in protein, by chemical analysis, but would make for lousy dog food.
There's absolutely no way that's possible. Chicken is about 70%-75% water.I actually contacted Purina regarding the weight of the chicken in the performance formula specifically and they noted that the weight of the chicken is the highest pre and post processing weight.
I beg to differ with your view on ProPlan,but to each his own. I find it hard to believe that Purina is actually putting toxins in their foods as you stated and I also question your sources on some of the other info you offered. As I mentioned nobody actually puts the research and money into nutrition studies to give you the best product for your dog. For me the proof is in the pudding and after feeding the ProPlan to my labs, I got healthy,active and performing dogs, I've been using ProPlan for many years and happy with the results. Good luck with whatever ya choose and you need to go with what best works for you, Jack
I'm just relaying what I was told directly from the mouth of one of the dietitians at Purina regarding their Pro Plan Performance blend.There's absolutely no way that's possible. Chicken is about 70%-75% water.
I didn't mean to imply you misstated anything. I'm sure that's is what you were told. However, look at it like this: chicken has a moisture content of about 70% when processing begins. Corn used for feed leaves the field with a moisture content of around 20% and is roughly 15% when processing begins. So if chicken is going to lose 60% of its overall weight during processing while corn is only going to lose 5% of its overall weight to get down the the standard 10% moisture content, you don't need to be a mathematician to see that if corn is present in the first few ingredients, it is impossible for chicken to be the first ingredient after processing.I'm just relaying what I was told directly from the mouth of one of the dietitians at Purina regarding their Pro Plan Performance blend.