RetrieverTraining.Net - the RTF banner

New CA law requires information on training or cruelty convictions

1 reading
3.2K views 16 replies 9 participants last post by  Kenneth Niles Bora  
#1 ·
FYI
***
September 20, 2022
California: Governor Signs Amended Training Bill – American Kennel Club

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a bill requiring dog trainers to disclose whether there have been any civil judgements regarding their training or any animal cruelty convictions.

The new law was significantly amended from the original version of Assembly Bill 1901 at the request of AKC, sportsmen, and trainers throughout the state. It goes into effect on January 1, 2023.

Assembly Bill 1901 as originally introduced sought to regulate all trainers as boarding facilities and included 13 pages of new requirements.

As signed by the governor, the new law simply requires disclosure of a trainer’s name and address, as well as any civil judgements relating to their animal training services or animal cruelty convictions (read AKC’s previous alert for more information). If there are no such judgements or convictions, that must be conveyed as well. The law does not specify how the information must be disclosed, presumably leaving that up to the individual trainers or clubs (Written statements, online, etc.)

For more information on California legislation impacting dog owners, contact AKC GR at doglaw@akc.org.
 
  • Like
Reactions: J. Marti
#5 ·
This is a BIG win for dog trainers. The bill as first introduced included these requirements:
How is more government requirements ever a win for anyone?
Within two years E collars will be illegal in California. You heard it here first.
Would not surprise me. Even if they aren't banned, there is a good chance that California's power grid won't be able to charge them:cool:
 
#8 ·
If you don't want to work to try to ratchet down extreme legislation, that is your choice.
The solution to extreme legislation is not slightly less extreme legislation.
If you are opposed to stricter government requirements regarding border crossing and voter ID laws
Those laws have been in the books for many years and are being ignored.
 
#10 ·
Okay. I haven't spent any time on most of the borders of the U.S. so I will take your word for it. What types of violations have you seen? At what border crossings? Just in Texas? Florida? California? North Dakota? Michigan?

I have, however, spent substantial amounts of time--I am talking a couple of years of my life--in election headquarters in many municipalities, counties, and states. I have never seen anyone I would consider having purposely violated ID laws but how would I know?

Where and when have you seen voter ID violations? Were you there as an elections official, a designated party official, or a designated observer? A journalist? Constitutionally designated law enforcement officer?
1. I have no idea what you are talking about.
2. Start a thread on POTUS if you would like to discuss it.
 
#12 ·
You implied border and election laws were not being enforced. I wanted to know if you have first-hand evidence.
I don't live in Martha's Vineyard, if that is what you are asking.
If you hate government requirements, the AKC is a governing body. You have a talented golden male but the AKC governing body restricts you from breeding him. But you own the dog so why not breed him? There are plenty of great dogs/litters that are not AKC registered or eligible for AKC registration.
Anyone with a talented, healthy Golden bitch is free to contact me. All my contact info is on the judges directory.