Is that what you call the show lab? Are there other names?
I'm genuinely curious if this means there's a difference in "training weight" and showing weight? Ie: do you fatten a healthy dog to show it?mcderrylabs said:Rude! But my pigadors look real good when in hunting//training weight or not being shown.. you cut back on the food! :roll:
I'd been hearing "pigador" in relation to working style, rather than body style or weight, long before hearing it applied to bench dogs. And while many seem to worry about too much dog, it's the ones without drive that I find sad to watch going through trained motions, or not, and fear with each new pup. Know a lot more about harness drive than creating it.FOM said:Any lab regardless of the pedigree can be a pig-a-dor.
It can be from genetics or training.
Basically it is a dog when sent to retrieve could put you to sleep watching it make the retrieve - no style, no desire, BORING. Also don't confuse an older dog who WANTS the bird, but the body just won't keep up with a pig-a-dor.
FOM
I was told by a well known professional handler I had to put 15# on my dog before she could be shown. I wouldn't do it for health reasons and she's still here at almost 15 years. That is the real reason some field dogs aren't shown more. Who wants to do that to their dog!Ie: do you fatten a healthy dog to show it?
Thought this was the bullfighting forum?crackerd said:Surely something was lost in translation and Linda meant to ask about the picador, which is found in the bullfighting forum.
MG
Be that as it may, I just don't understand what the original poster is trying to achieve here. Seems like he's just looking for an arsenal of disparaging names to call show labs. I am not a fan of short fat Labs either, and I love a good show vs. field discussion, but name-calling does not achieve anything. At the end of the day, each side would go home offended but feeling superior about the type of the dog they own and further despising the other side.I started attending FTs back in the late '70s and even back then the term "pig" was used to describe a working Lab devoid of style (usually because of too much training pressure). We still use it today at FTs and HTs.
My experience is that "pigador" is used by field Lab folks to describe overweight show Labs.
So context is relevant.