I don’t want to start any sire bashing but would be interested in hearing opinions on lines that seem to have few cruciate issues. Do you think some lines tend to produce a lower incidence of knee issues? If so, which ones?
In a community this small (field trials) where our judges are our peers there is ZERO incentive to name names because ultimately someone(s) will be offended. And since it is a two way street who could know if the sire or dam should be implicated. In all likelihood it is a combination of the two so trying to avoid something to the detriment of trying to get something (high performance) is probably counterproductive.Great topic, but I hold no hope that those who know will say anything at all to educate those that yearn for healthy pups, but aren't privy to the info.
I tried replying no but no was too short.😉Should you be able to tell by the structure of the dam and sire.?Structure/angle?
Males who are pre puberty when neutered are the canine version of eunuchs, they tend to have long straight rear limbs which are probably more prone to cruciate injury. Anything beyond that is pure speculation unsupported by anything other than anecdotal evidence. Cruciate injuries occurred but were relatively uncommon until thirty years ago. The epidemic that ensued including previously unheard of juvenile tears pointed at something well beyond anatomical.EDA can poor structure /angle be one reason for torn ACL
There are no non cruciate injury breeds or lines. The vast majority of dogs with cruciate ligament injuries have long and successful careers. This is probably the orthopedic injury of athletic dogs with the highest percentage post surgical success.I understand this is a hot topic, and for those of us that are not 'in the know' it is frustrating. I have had 3 well bred trial dogs and my current is the first with the dreaded cruciate issue....so far only one knee has needed to be repaired but was told the other is very likely by the surgeon. It is not my goal to point fingers or place blame, so instead my solution is I will no longer purchase pups out of FT lines. The surgery cost, rehab time, and it is pretty apparent she will never be the same makes this a very easy decision.
All of us always prefer to make informed decisions when given the choice.
No question that there is a yet unidentified genetic component. Our dogs have been “line bred” for 70 years but the advent of popular sire syndrome and frozen semen resulted in an abnormally large influence by a few individual males. The concentration of genetic traits, some good some bad, has altered the landscape. Puppies under 6 months of age with CCL injury and young dogs with bilateral tears was unheard of prior to +/- 1990.EdA I have always respected your knowledge and willingness to share it, it is a huge asset to this forum.
In your post earlier you mentioned a huge increase in the number of these injuries in the past 30 years. What can we attribute this to? The surgeon that did my dog told me it is hereditary, and especially prevalent in the FT lines.....too much line breeding, and those in the know choosing to overlook it.