I read through some old posts about Bubba. Just curious, who saw him run? Thoughts? Also, who’s seen his pups run? Thoughts? (Feel free to message me if you don’t want to share your thoughts publicly.)
Thanks!
Thanks!
He was an average size male in the 70 lb neighborhood
Perhaps the discrepancy is different definitions of average?He was average but produced larger sometimes and a variety of talent. Of course he was bred to a variety of females, many who weren’t run for titles, like many talented stud dogs.
I wouldn't.I think a 70 lb male would be on the small side.
Most bitches are selected for breeding based on the fact they can be.I always find it interesting. The majority of people seem to claim the bitch side has the most influence on a litter, but when the pups don't accomplish much, it's the stud.🤔
First off is probably because most don’t know the bitches as well as where the puppies were placed. The placement has a ton to do with the success especially in early litters. If a stud gets a reputation early, owners of top bitches will more likely go to them.I always find it interesting. The majority of people seem to claim the bitch side has the most influence on a litter, but when the pups don't accomplish much, it's the stud.🤔
My post was just a little jab at breeders that will get 3+ litters out of a bitch no matter what.First off is probably because most don’t know the bitches as well as where the puppies were placed. The placement has a ton to do with the success especially in early litters. If a stud gets a reputation early, owners of top bitches will more likely go to them.
Now, with that said, some males tend to throw nice dogs regardless of who they are bred to. Other dogs seem to throw below average dogs with multiple dames. I like to know and really like my bitch lines. 95% of the time or more, nice bitches are bred to quality studs. If I like the bitch, but not the stud or at least what he has previously thrown, I pass. Both sides contribute to the pups a lot. Too much time and money blown on this ridiculous sport for me to start behind the 8 ball.
You ever seen a FC AFC bitch bred to a sub par stud? I haven’t.Bjoiner wrote,
"95% of the time or more, nice bitches are bred to quality studs. "
How do you arrive at that number??
So you mean FC AFC titled bitches (nice bitches) when you make that statement.You ever seen a FC AFC bitch bred to a sub par stud? I haven’t.
Probably less than 1%However I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that those breedings make up a pretty small % of Labrador Retrievers hitting the ground.
The only one i can remember is FC AFC Naiki Anny bred to an untitled stud Super Powder, who was not only untitled but his hips wouldn't pass ofa and i had one of his offspring who was dysplastic as a youngster. That breeding produced Dr. Davey Phd, high point Derby dog, NFC afc Risky business Ruby, and several other very competitive dogs.You ever seen a FC AFC bitch bred to a sub par stud? I haven’t.
Could be wrong but I believe Super Powder predated OFA testing for hips/elbows?The only one i can remember is FC AFC Naiki Anny bred to an untitled stud Super Powder, who was not only untitled but his hips wouldn't pass ofa and i had one of his offspring who was dysplastic as a youngster.
Not true with regards to Super Powder, it was widely known that he was dysplastic. He had a nice Derby career but only one low all age placement. Tiger was different, he was high powered and carried with it some issues that arose from that. He had an Open win relatively young and other places just not enough for an FC. Pat Burns could give more detailed information on that.Could be wrong but I believe Super Powder predated OFA testing for hips/elbows?
Tiger would be another stud that, on paper, might appear "sub par".
Were test results available or was it just word of mouth? Also, was the genedic aspect of dysplasia recognized?Not true with regards to Super Powder, it was widely known that he was dysplastic.
OK. Let’s expand the population. Do you know any bitches that the owner of the bitch bred to a male that they thought was subpar to their bitch? I don’t unless it is someone that owned both and bred not knowing what they were doing.Probably less than 1%
The reason for the existence of the Orthopedic Foundation for Animals was the recognition that hip dysplasia was related to genetics. Some the early and most ardent backers were prominent people from retriever field trials.Were test results available or was it just word of mouth? Also, was the genedic aspect of dysplasia recognized?
I have heard Tigers story, guessing there are many unknown "Tigers" past and present.
I understand that Doc. I believe field trialers get credit for first recognizing EIC as well.The reason for the existence of the Orthopedic Foundation for Animals was the recognition that hip dysplasia was related to genetics. Some the early and most ardent backers were prominent people from retriever field trials.
Yes by at least a decade, NFC NAFA Super Chief had a very early OFA number and Augie Belmont was one of those involved with the formation of the OFA.I understand that Doc. I believe field trialers get credit for first recognizing EIC as well.
Did that recognition predate Super Powder?
In your opinion Doc, to what degree is hip/elbow displasia genetic vs environmental and or random chance?Yes by at least a decade, NFC NAFA Super Chief had a very early OFA number and Augie Belmont was one of those involved with the formation of the OFA.